ELECTION OF NEW INSTRUCTORS FOR COMPUTER COURSES AT LKP BINA TUNAS EDUCATION USING THE MULTI ATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY (MAUT) METHOD
(1) Information Systems Study Program, STMIK Dharma Wacana Metro, Lampung
(2) Information Systems Study Program, STMIK Dharma Wacana Metro, Lampung
Corresponding Author
Abstract
An instructor is a person whose job is to teach something and at the same time provide training and guidance, teacher, trainer, and caregiver. Among other assets such as capital, buildings, office equipment, and others, only instructors can breathe, think and behave. This uniqueness, if it has good quality and is involved in business activities, will make a big contribution to the progress of the company or institution. To obtain quality trainers who meet the expected qualifications, the company carries out a selection process in recruiting new instructors. The selection process for instructor acceptance at LKP Bina Tunas Education is carried out to determine which instructor candidates will be accepted. This research aims to select new instructor candidates more objectively because weighting can be carried out against predetermined criteria using the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) method. Using predetermined selection criteria, namely minimum criteria for high school graduates, experience, age, status, competence, liking challenges, and orientation. Selection of the best approach (other methods) in an effort to realize the Selection of Acceptance of Candidates for LKP Instructur Bina Tunas Education.
Keywords
References
F. Siringoringo, N. Onella, and D. Purba, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen dengan Metode Maut ( Multi Attribute Utility Theory ),” in Seminar Nasional Sains & Teknologi Informasi (SENSASI), 2019, pp. 406–411.
S. Kayati, H. Yenni, and H. Asnal, “Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Kelas Unggulan di SMKN 1 Mandau Application of the Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ) Method in Decision Support Systems in Determining Superior,” Teknol. J. Ilm. Sist. Informas, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 39–46, 2022.
J. Y. Pak, V. V. Thai, and G. T. Yeo, “Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Evaluating Intangible Resources Affecting Port Service Quality,” Asian J. Shipp. Logist., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 459–468, 2015.
S. Kubler, J. Robert, W. Derigent, A. Voisin, and Y. Le Traon, “A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications,” Expert Syst. Appl., 2016.
R. Volvačiovas, Z. Turskis, D. Aviža, and R. Mikštiene, “Multi-attribute selection of public buildings retrofits strategy,” in Procedia Engineering, 2013, vol. 57, pp. 1236–1241.
S. H. Mousavi-Nasab and A. Sotoudeh-Anvari, “A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems,” Mater. Des., vol. 121, 2017.
J. A. Annema, N. Mouter, and J. Razaei, “Cost-benefit analysis (CBA), or multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) or both: Politicians’ perspective in transport policy appraisal,” Transp. Res. Procedia, 2015.
T. E. Erkan and B. D. Rouyendegh, “Curriculum Change Parameters Determined by Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM),” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 116, no. 1987, pp. 1744–1747, 2014.
A. A. Soebroto and S. Hartati, “Penentuan Jenis Ikan Air Tawar Untuk Usaha Pembesaran Menggunakan Multicriteria Decision Making ( MCDM ),” in KNSI 2018, 2018, pp. 730–738.
D. I. Bella Yuristika Fauji, Muhamad Muslihudin, “Handphone Selection Decision Support System Using Analytical Hierarchy Process Method,” J. Intell. Bus. Technol. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2020.
M. M. Rita Irviani, Sri Hartati, “Model Development in Decision Making on Village Apparatus Performance Measurement After Working From Home Using Weighted Product Method,” J. TAM ( Technol. Accept. Model ), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2022.
T. Siti Mukodimah, Muhamad Muslihudin, Suyono, “The Naïve Bayes Method as A Measurement Model Effectiveness of Online Learning,” J. TAM (Technology Accept. Model., vol. 13, no. 23, pp. 131–137, 2022.
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 282 times
Download : 83 times
DOI: 10.56327/jurnaltam.v14i2.1605
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
