THE INFLUENCE OF CHATGPT USAGE ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN THE ALGORITHM AND PROGRAMMING COURSE AT UNIVERSITAS AL-KHAIRIYAH

Rulin Swastika(1), Didda Yuliana Rahayu(2),


(1) Informatics Engineering Study Program, Faculty Knowledge Computer, Al-Khairiyah University
(2) Informatics Engineering Study Program, Faculty Knowledge Computer, Al-Khairiyah University, Cilegon, Banten
Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the influence of ChatGPT usage on student learning outcomes in the Algorithms and Programming course at Universitas Al-Khairiyah. The background of this research is rooted in the growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in education, particularly in supporting the understanding of complex concepts. A quantitative approach was used, with data collected through a linear scale (1–4) questionnaire distributed to students. The analysis results show a strong and significant relationship between the use of ChatGPT and student learning outcomes, with a correlation value of 0.672. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.452 indicates that ChatGPT usage contributes 45.2% to the variation in student achievement. These findings demonstrate that effective use of ChatGPT can enhance students' conceptual understanding, task completion efficiency, and overall academic performance. Therefore, ChatGPT can be considered a promising learning tool to improve the quality of education in the field of technology and informatics.

Keywords


ChatGPT; learning outcomes; algorithms and programming; artificial intelligence; higher education.

References


Ida bagus, “ChatGPT pengetahuan besar dan pemanfaatan kombinasi keahlian dengan chatgpt di berbagai bidang,” Jambi: PT . Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2024, p. 3.

R. D. Indahsari, T. D. Andini, . S., A. E. Irsyada, and J. Arifin, “Pemanfaatan Chat GPT Dalam Pembelajaran Secara Optimal Di SMK Al-Basthomi Loceret Nganjuk,” vol. 3, no. 2, p. 81, Oct. 2024.

N. Asisah, L. Raihani, and H. Abdul, “Persepsi Siswa Terhadap Penggunaan ChatGPT Sebagai Belajar Di Era Digital,” vol. 10, 2025.

Muhammad Nur Rachman Nidhi Suryono, Rommy Esvaldo Bhagaskara, Muhammad Aldi Pratama, and Arista Pratama, “Analisis Pengaruh ChatGPT Terhadap Produktivitas Mahasiswa,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 364–373, 2023.

A. Kadir, Pengenalan teknologi informasi. Yogyakarta: CV. ANDI, 2005.

D. Gujarati and D. Porter, “Implementasi Artificial Intelligence pada Sistem Pakar Diagnosis Menggunakan Backward Chaining Berbasis Java dan Jess,” pp. 8–25, 2010.

S. Hartati, Kecerdasan Buatan Berbasis Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta: Irwan, 2023.

Ismail, A. Widiarti, D. Muhadiansyah, and Evan Koesumah, Kontroversi Chatgpt dalam Dunia Pendidikan. TEMPO, 2024.

A. A. Syanzani, N. Azrina, and V. Fitriani, “Analisis Keefektifan ChatGPT dalam Membantu Proses Belajar pada Mahasiswa STMIK Antar Bangsa,” 2024.

M. McCord, “Technology acceptance model,” Handb. Res. Electron. Surv. Meas., pp. 306–308, 2006.

Y. H. Al-Mamary, M. Al-nashmi, Y. A. G. Hassan, and A. Shamsuddin, “A Critical Review of Models and Theories in Field of Individual Acceptance of Technology,” Int. J. Hybrid Inf. Technol., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 143–158, 2016.

F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness , Perceived Ease Of Use , And User Acceptance,” MIS Q., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989.

R. Mukra and Y. Nasution, “Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Project Based Learning Dengan Problem Based Learning Pada Materi Pencemaran Dan Pelestarian Lingkungan Hidup Kelas X SMA Prayatna Medan 2015/2016,” no. September, pp. 750–759, 2017.

N. Hikmah, “Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru dan Pengetahuan Awal Siswa terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Implikasinya terhadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Siswa,” Indones. J. Econ. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2018.

M. F. Shahzad, S. Xu, and I. Javed, “ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: the role of trust as a cornerstone,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, p. 46, Jul. 2024.

A. S. Embark and Y. A. Amin, “Evaluating AI Performance in Academic Settings: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-4 and Gemini,” J. Artif. Intell. Eng. Pract., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–30, Apr. 2025.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 233 times
PDF Download : 97 times

DOI: 10.56327/jurnaltam.v16i1.1831

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.