SINGLE-LABEL LEARNING STYLE CLASSIFICATION USING MACHINE LEARNING WITH GRIDSEARCH-BASED HYPERPARAMETER TUNING ON LMS BEHAVIORAL DATA

Uning Lestari(1), Sazilah Salam(2), Yun Huoy Choo(3),


(1) Department of Informatics, Universitas AKPRIND Indonesia, Yogyakarta,
(2) Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Melaka
(3) Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Melaka
Corresponding Author

Abstract


The rapid growth of online learning environments has increased the importance of Learning Management Systems (LMS) as a rich source of behavioral data for learning analytics. One learner characteristic that strongly influences learning effectiveness is learning style; however, traditional questionnaire based identification approaches suffer from subjectivity, limited scalability, and static representation. To address these limitations, this study proposes a machine learning-based approach for automatic learning style classification using LMS behavioral data grounded in the Felder–Silverman Learning Style Model (FSLSM). This study utilizes LMS activity log data collected from Universitas Siber Asia over three academic years (2022–2024). The dataset consists of 5,633 student interaction records with 72 raw behavioral attributes, which were preprocessed, aggregated, and transformed into 12 representative behavioral features reflecting students’ interactions with learning materials, assessments, discussions, multimedia resources, and navigation patterns. A rule-based FSLSM mapping mechanism was applied to generate 16 learning style profiles, which were treated as targets in a single-label classification setting. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gradient Boosting (GB) classifiers were implemented and optimized using feature selection and GridSearch-based hyperparameter tuning. The dataset was divided into 75% training data and 25% testing data using a stratified split to preserve class distribution. Experimental results show that Gradient Boosting consistently outperforms SVM across all evaluation metrics. The GB model achieved an accuracy of 0.84 and a macro F1-score of 0.79, demonstrating strong generalization capability and robustness to class imbalance. In contrast, SVM exhibited lower and less stable performance, particularly on minority learning style classes. These findings confirm that ensemble-based methods such as Gradient Boosting are more effective for LMS-based single-label learning style classification and support the feasibility of automatic FSLSM-based learning style detection for data-driven adaptive learning systems.

Keywords


Felder–Silverman Learning Style Model; Gradient Boosting; GridSearch; Learning Style Classification; Machine Learning; Support Vector Machine;

References


D. Ifenthaler, D. K. Mah, and J. Y. K. Yau, ‘Utilising learning analytics for study success: Reflections on current empirical findings’, in Utilizing learning analytics to support study success, 2019.

D. Gašević, S. Dawson, A. Pardo, D. Gašević, S. Dawson, and A. Pardo, ‘How do we start? State and Directions of Learning Analytics Adoption’, 2016 ICDE Pres. Summit, 2016.

A. Al-Azawei, A. Al-Bermani, and K. Lundqvist, ‘Evaluating the effect of arabic engineering students’ learning styles in blended programming courses’, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., 2016.

L. Márquez, V. Henríquez, H. Chevreux, E. Scheihing, and J. Guerra, ‘Adoption of learning analytics in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review’, British Journal of Educational Technology. 2024.

H. M. Truong, ‘Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities’, Comput. Human Behav., vol. 55, pp. 1185–1193, 2016.

M. Riestra-González, M. del P. Paule-Ruíz, and F. Ortin, ‘Massive LMS log data analysis for the early prediction of course-agnostic student performance’, Comput. Educ., 2021.

R. Umer, T. Susnjak, A. Mathrani, and S. Suriadi, ‘On predicting academic performance with process mining in learning analytics’, J. Res. Innov. Teach. Learn., 2017.

C. Romero and S. Ventura, ‘Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey’, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 2020.

M. Raleiras, A. H. Nabizadeh, and F. A. Costa, ‘Automatic learning styles prediction: a survey of the State-of-the-Art (2006–2021)’, J. Comput. Educ., 2022.

Y. Ikawati, M. U. H. Al Rasyid, and I. Winarno, ‘Student Behavior Analysis to Predict Learning Styles Based Felder Silverman Model Using Ensemble Tree Method’, Emit. Int. J. Eng. Technol., 2021.

F. Rasheed and A. Wahid, ‘Learning style detection in E-learning systems using machine learning techniques’, Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 174, no. September 2020, p. 114774, 2021.

B. Hmedna, A. El Mezouary, and O. Baz, ‘A predictive model for the identification of learning styles in MOOC environments’, Cluster Comput., 2020.

S. Hakkal and A. A. Lahcen, ‘XGBoost To Enhance Learner Performance Prediction’, Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, no. January, p. 100254, 2024.

M. L. Zhang and Z. H. Zhou, ‘A review on multi-label learning algorithms’, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2014.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 33 times
PDF Download : 17 times

DOI: 10.56327/ijiscs.v9i3.1876

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.