DIGITAL LIBRARY ACCEPTANCE ANALYSIS USING COMPUTER-ASSISTED QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE (CAQDAS) AT UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA
(1) Information System Study Program, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, East Java
(2) Information System Study Program, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, East Java
(3) Information System Study Program, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, East Java
Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to determine the factors that influence the interest of UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya students in using the Digital library. This study uses the Content Analysis model using the Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) technique as the sampling method. The number of samples in this study were 6 informants. Content Analysis according to Krippendorff, (2004) is a research method used to arrive at conclusions that can be replicated with valid results from the data to the context, with the result being new insights, representations of facts and practical guidance for action. To manage the data that has been obtained in the field, researchers use the NVivo software. The results obtained show seven significant conclusions, that the acceptance of the Digital Library by UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya students is good enough with constructive answers.
Keywords
References
Abdul Rahman, A. R., & Mohezar, S. (2020). Ensuring continued use of a digital library: A qualitative approach. The Electronic Library, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-12-2019-0294.
About the Repository—Digilib UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. (n.d.). Retrieved February 11, 2023, from https://Digilib.uinsa.ac.id/information.html.
Alam, Md. K. (2020). A Systematic Qualitative Case Study: Questions, Data Collection, NVivo Analysis and Saturation. In Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal: Vol. ahead-of print. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825
Bazeley, Pat. (2007). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo.
Beavis, A. S. W., Hojjati, A., Kassam, A., Choudhury, D., Fraser, M., Masching, R., & Nixon, S. A. (2015). What all students in healthcare training programs should learn to increase health equity: Perspectives on postcolonialism and the health of Aboriginal Peoples in Canada. BMC Medical Education, 15, 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0442-y.
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
Bungin, Burhan. 2011. Qualitative Research. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Burnard, P. (1991). Stress and self-awareness. In P. Burnard (Ed.), Coping with Stress in the Health Professions: A practical guide (pp. 32–61). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3338-6_3
Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4(3), 5–16.
Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Methods, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006
Glickman, D., Gordon, P., & Ross-Gordon, M. (2007). Supervision and instructional leadership. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Griffin, S.M. (1999). Digital Libraries Initiative – Phase 2: Fiscal Year 1999 Awards. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 26(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.137
Hamsari, M. A. S., & Prabowo, H. Y. (2021). Analysis of qualitative research trends on corruption in the economic field uses NVivo content analysis. Proceedings of National Conference on Accounting & Finance, 253–268.
Johnson, R., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational Research Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches Fifth Edition.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in Content Analysis. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x
L berg, B. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences.
McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2015). Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion. DOI: 10.1177/0267659114559116.
Park, N., Kee, K., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 12, 729–733. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE.
Paulus, F. W., Ohmann, S., & Popow, C.(2016). Practitioner Review: School-based interventions in child mental health. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(12), 1337–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12584
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal, and Utilization. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Røddesnes, S., Faber, H. C., & Jensen, M. R. (2019). NVivo courses in the library: Working to create the library services of tomorrow. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15845/noril.v11i1.2762
Shank, G. (2002). Qualitative research a personal skills aproach. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Merril PrenticeHall.
Siccama, Carolyn J., & Penna, Stacy (2008). Increase the validity of qualitative dissertation research studies using NVivo. Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(2), 91-103. doi: 10.3316/ QRJ0802091.
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction / D. Silverman.
Trujillo Amaya, J. (2018). El Pragmatismo en el análisis de los Collected Papers de C. S. Peirce con Provalis Research. Praxis Filosófica Nueva Serie, 231. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i45.6062
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Welsh, E. (2002). Dealing with Data: Using NVivo in the Qualitative Data Analysis Process. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3.
Wong, L. (2008). Data analysis in qualitative research: A brief guide to using NVivo. Malaysian Family Physician: The Official Journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 3(1), 14–20.
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 603 times
Download : 154 times
DOI: 10.56327/jurnaltam.v14i2.1552
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
