AN EXPLAINABLE DEEP LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR PERSONALIZED UNIVERSITY MAJOR RECOMMENDATION BASED ON STUDENTS' INTERESTS AND APTITUDES

Septian Dwi Putra(1), Agus Suryana(2), Setyawan Widyarto(3), Satria Abadi(4),


(1) Information Systems, Institut Bakti Nusantara, Lampung
(2) Information Systems, Institut Bakti Nusantara, Lampung
(3) Faculty of Communication, Visual Art & Computing, Universiti Selangor
(4) Research Collaboration Program, Sultan Idris Education University
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Selecting an appropriate university major significantly influences students’ academic achievement, motivation, and career development. However, conventional academic guidance frequently relies on subjective assessments without adequately integrating students’ interests, aptitudes, and academic performance. This study proposes an explainable deep learning framework for personalized university major recommendations using multidimensional student profiles collected from senior high schools across 20 subdistricts in Tanggamus Regency, Indonesia. The framework integrates Holland’s RIASEC vocational interest theory, psychometric aptitude assessments, and academic achievement indicators. Twenty neural network configurations involving Feedforward Neural Networks (FFNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), and Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM) were evaluated using classification metrics. Comparative results identified Bi-LSTM as the best-performing architecture, achieving 91.7% accuracy, followed by LSTM (91.2%), GRU (90.5%), and dropout-based FFNN (90.1%). Furthermore, 84% agreement was observed between students’ selected majors and system recommendations. Nevertheless, learning curves indicated substantial overfitting and limited validation performance, highlighting the need for independent verification. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) were incorporated to enhance recommendation transparency. This study contributes an integrated framework combining vocational interests, deep learning, and explainable artificial intelligence to support personalized academic guidance and evidence-based university major selection.

Keywords


Explainable Artificial Intelligence; Deep Learning; University Major Recommendation; Holland RIASEC; Student Aptitude; Personalized Recommendation Systems.

References


Y. Jian, N. Xiao, and L. Youfeng, “A recommendation model for college majors based on deep learning and clustering algorithms,” Information Services & Use, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 165–175, 2024, doi: 10.3233/ISU-230201.

Y. Yang, X. Peng, M. Chen, and S. Liu, “An explainable graph-based course recommendation model based on multiple interest factors,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 264, Art. no. 125889, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125889.

T. Yang et al., “Boosting course recommendation explainability: A knowledge entity aware model using deep learning,” in Proc. 32nd International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE), 2024, doi: 10.58459/icce.2024.4862.

K. Wagner, A. Merceron, P. Sauer, and N. Pinkwart, “A course recommender system built on success to support students at risk in higher education,” Journal of Educational Data Mining, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 330–364, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11384083.

B. Ma, T. Yang, and B. Ren, “A survey on explainable course recommendation systems,” in Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2024, pp. 273–287, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60012-8_17.

J. Li, Q. Lyu, W. Qiu, and A. W. H. Khong, “Improving course recommendation systems with explainable AI: LLM-based frameworks and evaluations,” in Proc. 18th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15870185.

“Interpretability-driven course recommendation: A random forest approach with explainable AI,” Bentham Science, 2026, doi: 10.2174/0123520965401121250714075403.

“Explainable learning analytics: Assessing the stability of student success prediction models by means of explainable AI,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 182, Art. no. 114229, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2024.114229.

O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, and F. Gouverneur, “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators?,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, Art. no. 39, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.

S. Zhang, L. Yao, A. Sun, and Y. Tay, “Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 52, no. 1, Art. no. 5, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3285029.

Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015, doi: 10.1038/nature14539.

A. Adadi and M. Berrada, “Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI),” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 52138–52160, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052.

A. Barredo Arrieta et al., “Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI,” Information Fusion, vol. 58, pp. 82–115, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012.

M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, “‘Why should I trust you?’: Explaining the predictions of any classifier,” in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 1135–1144, doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939778.

S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017. [Online]. Available: NeurIPS Proceedings.

J. L. Holland, Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments, 3rd ed. Odessa, FL, USA: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997.

F. M. Lord and M. R. Novick, Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1968.

L. J. Cronbach and P. E. Meehl, “Construct validity in psychological tests,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 281–302, 1955, doi: 10.1037/h0040957.

D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, “Learning representations by back-propagating errors,” Nature, vol. 323, pp. 533–536, 1986, doi: 10.1038/323533a0.

F. Ricci, L. Rokach, and B. Shapira, Eds., Recommender Systems Handbook, 3rd ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 0 times
PDF Download : 0 times

DOI: 10.56327/ijiscs.v10i2.1918

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.